Daily Archives: June 16, 2010

Painting The Carport, Part I

I’ve heard it said that the most stressful times in a person’s life may be moving, having a child, breaking up or divorce, undergoing construction — or experiencing a death. I’ve often joked that at least one of these things may lead to another.

I’ve heard it said that the most stressful times in a person’s life may be moving, having a child, breaking up or divorce, undergoing construction — or experiencing a death. I’ve often joked that at least one of these things may lead to another.

I told Zack the other day that construction of the carport (with me as his up close and personal painting assistant of several days) could have led to a breakup, had it continued much longer. He joked (as usual) that he liked to think of that possibility as “trading me in on a newer model.” I joked back that he was lucky I didn’t prefer to think of it as homicide.

If we had a video of the two most stressful days, he would never have believed it. Who was that impatient, grouchy man? It was like Laurel and Hardy on the way to divorce court. Zack can become so focused on the job at hand that he blocks out everything else. In part, this is a survival tactic during recovery from paralysis. He was having a hard enough time keeping his precarious balance on the scaffolding, holding the sprayer level — at a challengingly high level for his recovering arms. His hands and fingers weren’t working so well either. I was having problems of my own. But he wasn’t aware of or interested in those.

Assisting Zack during his recovery from Guillain-Barre hasn’t been easy — mainly because he’s chosen such difficult challenges all the way through, at whichever level of recovery he’s been. We call our ranch the Rehabilitation Camp. Never one for patience, he’s pushed and pushed, refusing to allow the syndrome (and the recovery) to hold him back more than or longer than absolutely necessary. Zack is a man of purpose. He has things to do. Even when he wasn’t ready to take on a certain project, he assumed that with my help, we would make it happen. And so we did, often with great difficulty (and often distress) — because he wouldn’t give up — or wait until he was better. Zack wasn’t going to sit around and wait. I’ve often insisted that this drive has fueled his recovery.

Zack’s refusal to accept even understandable restrictions required more of me than he had any right to expect. He never seemed to realize this, and I rarely pointed it out. I figured I could at least try to do whatever he asked of me. It never seems to occur to Zack that I’m physically unable or ill equipped to do certain things, lift heavy items, etc. He often doesn’t register that after helping him for hours, I still must find time for my own chores, shopping, cooking, laundry, paperwork, bill paying, maybe even a little writing, catching up on a myriad of things, etc. (Whine, whine). Sometimes I must actually rest, an alien thought to Zack. This seems to perplex him. After all, what have I to be tired about?

“You complain that you don’t have enough time, yet you sit for hours at your computer,” he tells me. He doesn’t realize that sometime sitting’s all I can manage. (So why not in front of the computer?  When Zack needs to rest, he watches old movies. We all have our opiate of choice).

Things ARE so much easier now that I’ve gone from caregiver to assistant. I even have a little time to myself, much less than he thinks and worlds less than I need. I have the feeling that to wrangle a full day or two off from THIS demanding boss, I’d need to be so sick in bed that I couldn’t function. And not wanting that, I won’t complain further. I figure if HE can push himself to come back from total paralysis, persevere through the physical disabilities and challenges he still must overcome, then I should be able to follow along.  Next week I’ll describe our painting scenario, and you’ll better appreciate the inclusion of the joke with which I’ll close (not that I approve of physical abuse. I am however a fan of self defense).

A man sporting various casts and tubes lies in traction in the hospital, black and blue, covered with bandages. His visiting friend asks how he ended up in this sorry state. “I’m not quite sure,” the man replies — and goes on to describe a livestock show he and his wife attended. “We were viewing an exhibit of bulls, each with a sign showing how many times the animal had serviced a cow in the previous year. “Look, honey, this one says 63,” says the wife. That’s more than once a week. Hmmm.”  She gives him a little wink. They move from stall to stall. “Wow, this sign says 150! That’s more than twice a week. You could sure take a lesson from this bull here,” she chuckles and pokes him in the ribs. The next sign reads 365. “Honey, that’s every day!” She gives him a long, meaningful look. “Yes,” the man answered his teasing wife, “but I’ll bet it wasn’t with the same old cow.”

“And that’s the last thing I remember before I woke up here.”

Have a great week everyone!

Gene Ellis, Ed.D is a Bosque County resident who returned to the family farm after years of living in New Orleans, New York, and Florida. She’s an artist who holds a doctoral degree from New York University and is writing a book about the minor catastrophes of life. Check out Genie’s blog at  http://rusticramblings.wordpress.com/

 

Metrosexual, Schmetrosexual

The line between what is male and what is female continues to blur. Stereotypes are dropping every day. A doctor is not automatically a man; a nurse is not automatically a woman. A pilot can be a female; a flight attendant can be a male. A jerk can be a man or a woman. Someone buying makeup is not necessarily a woman. Today there is even a category of men called, “metrosexual.” No, that doesn’t mean people who like to have sex on the subway. It refers to men who pay attention to their appearance in a way that stereotypically used to be considered strictly female. The latest woman-man crossover is the girdle for men. It was bound to happen, wasn’t it?

The line between what is male and what is female continues to blur. Stereotypes are dropping every day. A doctor is not automatically a man; a nurse is not automatically a woman. A pilot can be a female; a flight attendant can be a male. A jerk can be a man or a woman. Someone buying makeup is not necessarily a woman. Today there is even a category of men called, “metrosexual.” No, that doesn’t mean people who like to have sex on the subway. It refers to men who pay attention to their appearance in a way that stereotypically used to be considered strictly female. The latest woman-man crossover is the girdle for men. It was bound to happen, wasn’t it?

Some call this men’s girdle a “mirdle.” It’s not exactly a girdle because of where it’s worn. However, it has the same “compression technology” that has been used for some women’s undergarments. (An example of this technology in female underwear is actually called the “bra-llelujah).” The most popular of these new male mentionables is a T-shirt/undershirt that emphasizes a man’s muscles and minimizes his fat. To me, it just looks like a fifty-dollar undershirt.

For decades, women have campaigned to be entitled to whatever men have. Now it’s the male gender’s turn to feel entitled to something that has often been the province of women – spending money to move fat around their bodies. (I never really understood the physics of this. If fat is squeezed in one area of the body, doesn’t it just pop up somewhere else)?

So in addition to all of the male cosmetics that have become big sellers in recent years, now we have the male slimming garment. I’m sure soon there will be men wearing “mantyhose.” There are already underpants for men that have padding in them to give the illusion of having a bigger butt. (Why would … who knows)? In this era of the sexual equality of spandex, both women and men can satisfy their obsession with making some body parts look smaller and other parts bigger.

Why now? What is it about this era, this zeitgeist that’s making men grab $58 slimming T-shirts off the racks faster than they can sing, “I Feel Pretty?” We are in a recession. Money is supposed to be tight, not underwear.

I assume those buying these garments rationalize it. Maybe they’d say it’s cheaper than plastic surgery – as if accepting how you look isn’t even an alternative. Maybe they’re hunting for a job, want to look their best, and feel this new kind of underwear will help them get hired. Okay, but I just can’t picture a guy going for a job interview without that butt padding and then after he leaves, those who do the hiring talking about him like this: “He was very qualified, his references were good, and he really seemed to have a handle on what we do here. Obviously, we can’t hire him. His butt’s too small.”

It’s possible that all this male over-primping might actually be costing guys jobs. Say a man has a job interview in the morning. He gets up and weighs himself. Then he takes a shower using lavender soap. He washes his hair with a volumizing shampoo followed by an almond conditioner. He dries himself off and looks in one of his way-too-many mirrors. He applies a male cover-up to a blemish. He shaves very carefully, making sure that his shave doesn’t make him look as if he’s shaved. (Could someone please explain this fashion to me)? Next, he puts on his new slimming and muscle-popping undershirt. He slips on his underpants with the butt pads. He finishes getting dressed and checks himself out in yet another mirror. He looks great. Everything’s perfect. So why won’t he get the job? By the time he finishes primping and getting dressed, he’s two hours late for the interview.

Lloyd Garver has written for many television shows, ranging from “Sesame Street” to “Family Ties” to “Home Improvement” to “Frasier.”  He has also read many books, some of them in hardcover.  He can be reached at lloydgarver@gmail.com. Check out his website at lloydgarver.com and his podcasts on iTunes.

June 2010
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930