The GOP Reviewed
What is wrong with the Republican Party? My last commentary focused on the GOP’s 5 Propositions for its upcoming primary election. I received many comments from angry GOP members who chastised me for the commentary and especially regarding Prop. 4, which proposes: (read more)
“It’s a dirty job, but someone has to do it.”
What is wrong with the Republican Party?
My last commentary focused on the GOP’s 5 Propositions for its upcoming primary election.
I received many comments from angry GOP members who chastised me for the commentary and especially regarding Prop. 4, which proposes:
Ballot Proposition 4: Public Acknowledgement of God
The use of the word “God”, prayers, and the Ten Commandments should be allowed at public gatherings and public educational institutions, as well as be permitted on government buildings and property.
It is great that so many have responded on this issue. Please continue to do so. It is a pathway for open discourse.
“Walker,” I agree with you. Never said otherwise. I respect all religions including mine. However, being able to bow your head at a baseball game already is your given right under the Constitution of the United States, so…
…why on God’s good Earth do we need to add such a law???
Perhaps you could enlighten us further?
“Ladytex,” I agree with you as well. But, believing in God and acknowledging in public is different from being led by public officials to do so at public events. Perhaps you could respond to my question?
Lastly, “Anonymous,” you also provide honest responses that I agree with, but if the party, your party — MY PARTY, also — wants to know this information, why not send out a questionnaire flyer or an online survey to its members instead of proposing it as part of a ballot, to be considered at a future date to become a law?
All of you seem to take a shot at me as though I have a problem with YOU praying in public, which I do not. That’s your right and my right as well.
I do however have a problem with a political party asking people such questions on a ballot and also in lieu of becoming a specific law in our State Constitution, which could still occur.
Heck, I’ve offered prayers in public myself but that’s my own business and I don’t need a specific law, political party or a public official at an event to “lead me” in prayer to do so. It is NOT a public official’s place or role to lead us in prayer or in a public display of religion, nor should it be. It should be left up to each individual, as the Constitution already allows.
We have churches, mosques, synagogues, etc. so we may be LED into prayer, as we may want it.
I suggest you all think about what I am offering here. I am not against religion or if an individual wants to pray in public. That is NOT what I am saying. NOT at all. Those rights are already established.
Again, what I am saying about Prop. 4 is that we do NOT require such a law and I continue to question why it is so important for a political party to know your religious business as part of the party’s business.
It is NONE of the Republican Party’s business about our religious preferences nor that we should place religious overtures into the Constitution. It is none of its business as it is none of its business who we will vote for. Actually, it is a further intrusion of government into our lives.
Again, such a law is NOT required so why do it?
During the past decade the Republican Party platform has wavered in its sincerity and direction. We as a party have drifted from the Party of Eisenhower, through the Party of Ronald Reagan and into the 21st Century as the Party of George W. Bush. It is a direction that we should reconsider and question the actual goals and objectives of what I believe is a confused and misguided GOP.
I was proud to be a proud member of the GOP during the Eisenhower administration and today I am not so proud of my party.
Instead of focusing on silly and unnecessary questions, as these “propositions,” the GOP should be asking some truly HARD questions to its members, e.g.,
Are you happy with the GOP and its platform?
Are we promoting less or more government over our lives? And why? What do we hope to achieve?
What are the priorities of the GOP? And do we need to change them?
What changes, if any, are needed re: campaign financing?
Do we believe in a Democracy and in Capitalism? Or do we believe in Socialism and Tax-Payer Bail-Outs?
Should we consider specific term limitations of those in political offices?
…and other questions like these.
These more worthwhile questions and others could be asked to make the GOP a stronger and more committed party, a party we could be more proud of and one with more realistic goals and objectives.
You don’t have to agree. If you do not agree, please respond further to explain why the Propositions are needed and/or why you may disagree with my comments on important changes for the GOP.
Thank you.
(Peter Stern, a former director of information services, university professor and public school administrator, is a disabled Vietnam veteran who lives in Driftwood, Texas.)
Cackle Berries — Expensive Marriage
Very Expensive
Son: “Papa, how much does it cost to get married?”
Papa: “There’s a down payment and then you pay your entire salary every week for the rest of your life.”
GOOD QUESTIONS:
HOW DO THEY GET DEER TO CROSS THE ROAD ONLY AT THOSE YELLOW ROAD SIGNS?
WHAT WAS THE BEST THING BEFORE SLICED BREAD?
ONE NICE THING ABOUT EGOTISTS: THEY DON’T TALK ABOUT OTHER PEOPLE.
DOES THE LITTLE MERMAID WEAR AN ALGEBRA?
DO INFANTS E NJOY INFANCY AS MUCH AS ADULTS ENJOY ADULTERY?
HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO HAVE A CIVIL WAR?
IF ONE SYNCHRONIZED SWIMMER DROWNS, DO THE REST DROWN TOO?
DON’T SWEAT THE PETTY THINGS AND DON’T PET THE SWEATY THINGS.
IF YOU TRY TO FAIL, AND SUCCEED, WHICH HAVE YOU DONE?
Texas Candidates Take To Ballot
The 2010 general election is pending, subject to the outcome of various primaries in Texas. Some of the candidates are well known due to strong media presentation, while others are considered unknowns, although they, too, have placed their names of the ballot for consideration.
How Many Have You Heard Of?
AUSTIN, Texas — The 2010 general election is pending, subject to the outcome of various primaries in Texas. Some of the candidates are well known due to strong media presentation, while others are considered unknowns, although they, too, have placed their names of the ballot for consideration.
Here is the list:
GOVERNOR
Independents David Carpenter, Fran Cavanaugh, Curtis “Tank” Hartfield, Thomas Helm, Stephen McGee, Louis Podesta, Kenneth Richardson, Dale Robertson, John Roland Ross, Les Sanderfer, and Kevin Sill.
Republicans Debra Medina, Rick Perry, and Kay Bailey Hutchhison.
Democrats Alma Ludivina Aguado, Felix Alvarado, Bill Dear, Clement Glenn, Star Locke, Farouk Shami, and Bill White.
Libertarians Jeff Daiell, Katherine Youngblood Glass, Kenneth Griffin, Steve Nichols, M.J. “Smitty” Smith, and Ed Tidwell.
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR
Republican David Dewhurst.
Democrats Linda Chavez-Thompson, Ronnie Earle, and Marc Katz.
Libertarians Scott Jameson and Todd Minor.
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Independent Ruben Torres.
Republican Greg Abbott.
Democrat Barbara Ann Radnofsky.
Libertarians Barry Cooper and Jon Roland.
COMPTROLLER
Green Ed Lindsay.
Constitution Alan Marsh.
Republican Susan Combs.
Libertarian Mary Ruward.
STATE LAND COMMISSIONER
Republican Jerry Patterson.
Democrats Bill Burton and Hector Uribe.
Libertarian James Holder.
STATE AGRICULTURE COMMISSIONER
Republican Todd Staples.
Democrats Kinky Friedman and Hank Gilbert.
Libertarians Rick Donaldson and Leonard Nelson.
STATE RAILROAD COMMISSION
Republicans Victor Carrillo and David Porter.
Democrat Jeff Weems.
Libertarian Roger Gary.
9/11 and ‘33’ Codes
I take Dr. Kevin Barrett’s side in the ongoing debate about Israel and 9/11, wholeheartedly agreeing with him that Israel was complicit in the attacks. Like many of the 9/11 researchers, I’ve published my own article on this all-important topic:
The Crypto Case for Zionist Treason
TEXAS, 1/25/2010 — I take Dr. Kevin Barrett’s side in the ongoing debate about Israel and 9/11, wholeheartedly agreeing with him that Israel was complicit in the attacks. Like many of the 9/11 researchers, I’ve published my own article on this all-important topic:
9/11 was good for us! The case against Israel
Dr. Barrett, as a long-time member of Ghost Troop, is familiar with some of the cryptanalytic work we do to pick out Illuminatist and Kabbalist secret society fingerprints in false flag terror events. I would ask the objective thinker to consider four date code coincidences — if one chooses to call them that — that pretty much close the crypto case against Israel and its fifth column of U.S. Israel-firsters:
· New York City’s Holocaust Museum was dedicated on 9/11/97 — four years to the date before the 9/11 attacks. Pity as a perfect concealment for psychopathy.
· Berlin’s Holocaust Museum was dedicated on 9/9/01 — two days before the 9/11 attacks. Pity as a perfect concealment for psychopathy.
· Construction on the World Trade Center (North Tower) began on 8/8/68 — 33 years, 33 days before the 9/11 attacks.
· Chicago’s Sears Tower reached its full height 5/3/73 — 33 years, 33 days before the “Satanic” date of 6/6/06 — coinciding with the Sears Tower ZIP code of 60606.
For those interested in more detail, I recommend my summer correspondence with another Ghost Troop, U.S. Amb. Chase Untermeyer, who served with the unit from 2003 – 2006:
2009 Top 9/11-2B Targets
For those interested in joining Ghost Troop’s ongoing cryptanalysis, please see the just-formed Apocalyptanalysis to apply for membership: